To obtain asylum in the United States, it is necessary to make a convincing showing to an immigration judge that you have a reasonable fear of danger if you return to your home country. This can be done by showing that there is a likelihood that you will be persecuted, or it may be shown by displaying evidence of past persecution. However, not every instance of abuse rises to the level of persecution. It is important to know the difference, because immigration judges certainly do.
Asylum Law Fundamentals
When a person applies for asylum in the United States, there are fundamental facts he or she must be able to prove to the immigration judge overseeing his or her case. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) defines a refugee as someone who has a well-founded fear of persecution in the future, either based on past persecution or on risk of persecution in the future if returned to their homeland because of their membership in a particular social group.
Persecution, either in the past or in the future, has no specific definition in U.S. law. The INA defines some examples that always qualify as persecution, such as threats against someone’s life or liberty based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, and other beliefs. However, the list is not meant to be exhaustive. It is not always physical; if severe enough, emotional or mental abuse can qualify as persecution.
The INA also specifies that the agent of this persecution must either be a governmental entity or an entity that the government has shown an inability (or unwillingness) to control. The prevailing opinion is that the government of a country is supposed to be able to control fringe elements within its borders, and if they can do so, the applicant can rely on their government instead of fleeing the country entirely.
Immigration Equality has defined five broad categories into which behavior classed as persecution by judges routinely falls. They are:
The fourth category is somewhat of a catch-all, but it is important that the word ‘severe’ is stressed. While the subjectivity of this approach has been criticized, U.S. law generally holds that harassment and discrimination alone do not meet the criteria to be characterized as persecution unless they are extreme and protracted campaigns. A homosexual person, for example, may not claim past persecution if he or she experienced only heckling. More severe consequences are generally required to convince an immigration judge that a person’s life would be in danger without a grant of asylum or withholding of removal.
Enlist Experienced Help
Because asylum law can be so subjective, it may make all the difference in the world to have a competent attorney on your side. The dedicated Chicago asylum attorneys at Mevorah Law Offices LLC will fight for you, working with you every step of the way to give you the best possible chance at your desired result. Contact us today for a free consultation.
Whether you are going through a divorce, injured in an accident, need to file a workers' compensation claim, charged with a crime, immigrating to the United States, or need to file for bankruptcy, Mevorah Law Offices LLC can help. Our trial lawyers have over 35 years of experience helping clients throughout Northern Illinois from five offices in Lombard, Bloomindale, Joliet, St. Charles, and Chicago.
Steven Mevorah has assembled experienced attorneys under one roof so that his clients need not search for a new attorney each time they need help. Mr. Mevorah has also established a wide network of additional attorneys so that his clients merely need to stop by Mevorah Law Offices LLC to find the attorney they need.
Our practice is focused on meeting your needs with flexible hours and locations to serve you: